12.15.72.45.92.171.319 · 13 · 73 · 2 · 39.97.16
“envoyé à Ivoy un mémoire pour établir & justifier les principes d’une nouvelle coalition …”
91 = Ivoy · 72 = le Duc · 13 = Athlone · 73 = Portland · 2 = de Luc

Berlin, Blankenburg → the Hereditary Prince of Orange · book code and numbered lists · 1796–1807 · attempted, not solved

Arend Willem van Reede to the Hereditary Prince, 1796–1807 (KHA A35-1232, A32-549)

Hereditary Prince William
toHereditary Prince William

Nine code passages from the Orange family’s envoy in Berlin were left undeciphered; his own key to one letter shows a book code whose book is not named, so they stay unread.

Daniel Bourdeau · posted

Method: not solved · Extent: text not obtained

At a glanceNot solved · text not obtained

The letters
Arend Willem baron van Reede, the Orangist envoy in Berlin, to the Hereditary Prince Willem Frederik (1796–1807) and to Princess Wilhelmina (1797–1801), in French with runs of numbers; several are written over a letter in invisible ink.
Where
Koninklijk Huisarchief, The Hague, A35-1232 (scans 143592, 143603, 144339, 144352, 144361, 144448–49, 144507) and A32-549 (171667, 171744). Not on DECODE.
The cipher
In 1796 a “Chiffre Littéral” in which a short run of numbers stands for a whole sentence, with dotted groups such as 39.97.16: a book code keyed to a shared printed text, beside a short list of numbers for names. From 1797 a larger numbered list with prefixes and superscripts.
How it was tried
All nine passages and four glossed letters were transcribed at full size. Van Reede’s 1789–92 code and the Euler word list of 1795–96 were tested on the glossed runs; neither fits (3 of 13 and 3 of 32 decoded words in the run’s own gloss).
Why it resists
The book of the 1796 code is not named anywhere in the file, and the later list has only about fifteen glossed values.
Van Reede's letter of 15 August 1796: French text with numbers glossed Ivoy, du Duc, Athlone, au Duc de Portland, de Luc, and the dotted run marked (1)
15 August 1796: name numbers glossed above (91 Ivoy, 72 du Duc, 13 Athlone, 73 au Duc de Portland, 2 de Luc) and the run marked (1.), “12.15.72.45.92.171.319”, explained on the next page. Image: Koninklijk Huisarchief, The Hague, A35-1232 (image 144358), via Koninklijke Verzamelingen.

01 The passages

The pairing of all 300 scans of A35-1232 and 139 of A32-549 (research files pairs_A35-1232.tsv, pairs_A32-549.tsv) left nine code passages with no decipherment:

ImageDateGroupsNote
143592Jan–Feb 179678 in 14 runsblack letter over brown invisible ink
143603Feb 179650rows of figures over an invisible-ink letter
144339P.S., Jan 179654the “petit chiffre”; warns not to confuse “valeurs réelles” with “indicateurs”
144352Blankenburg, 5 July 179619
144361“Précis” of 29 July 1796127sent in cipher because the letter was too long
144448–49c. Dec 180173between lines of invisible ink
144507c. 1806–0735over invisible ink
1716671797–98about 98to Wilhelmina; fractions and plus signs
171744Berlin, 5 Dec 1800 or 180146to Wilhelmina; “Votre chiffre primitif”

02 Van Reede’s Explication

Right page of the 15 August 1796 letter, headed Explication des chiffres employés dans la lettre
“Explication des chiffres employés dans la lettre; chaque trait indique que la phrase est finie, & qu’il faut passer au chiffre suivant.” Image: Koninklijk Huisarchief, The Hague, A35-1232 (image 144359), via Koninklijke Verzamelingen.

The letter of 15 August 1796 carries its own key. Its run (1.), seven groups, is explained as “envoyé à Ivoy un mémoire pour établir & justifier les principes d’une nouvelle coalition basant sur la reconnoissance de Louis XVIII comme seul moyen d’inspirer de la confiance à la Prusse”; run (3.) as “qu’il n’y avoit rien à faire dès que l’Angleterre n’adoptoit pas en plein la marche proposée”. Seven groups for some two hundred letters cannot be a letter cipher or a word code; with the dotted groups in the text (“39.97.16”, “29.17.19.37”) and Van Reede’s words, “Je me sers, Monseigneur, du Chiffre Littéral usité pour ma correspondance particulière avec Elle”, the system reads as a book code, each group pointing into a printed text that both men held. The text is not named in the file.

The Prince’s own drafts in the same folder (Berlin 11 June, 2 July 1796 and others) are the clear texts of letters he sent in cipher to Van Reede; the enciphered versions are not here.

03 What was tried

04 What remains open

05 Sources

Files: targets/reede1796/ (transcriptions, key test, NOTES).