Paris → Rome · numerical cipher · 5 January 1652

Guidi di Bagno’s first despatch of 1652

Niccolò Guidi di Bagno
fromNiccolò Guidi di Bagno

Four pages of figures from the papal nunciature during the Fronde. The 1632 Francia 346 key was tested and does not fit. No key or decipherment was found, and none is known in print.

Daniel Bourdeau · posted · updated

Method: not solved · Extent: text not obtained

At a glanceAttempted · not deciphered

The letter
Niccolò Guidi di Bagno to the Secretariat of State, Paris to Rome, 5 January 1652.
Where
Archivio Apostolico Vaticano, Segreteria di Stato, Francia 104, ff. 5r–7v; DECODE R5622.
The cipher
Four pages of unseparated decimal figures, with occasional Italian words left clear. Its grouping and values are unknown.
How it was tried
The Francia 346 key was tested and excluded by its mandatory 6 separator. Images, neighbouring records and print were checked; OCR was too noisy.
Still open
All four cipher pages. No matching key, clear copy or register decipherment was found online.

01 The letter

DECODE’s five images are fols. 5r, 6r, 6v, 7r and 7v of Archivio Apostolico Vaticano, Segreteria di Stato, Francia 104. The first leaf gives Paris and 5 January 1652. The next four are dense rows of decimal figures, broken occasionally by clear Italian words such as et, perche, hauerà, huomo and prudenza. The hand is legible, but spaces are inconsistent and the figures sometimes touch.

First page of Guidi di Bagno's ciphered despatch, with long rows of figures and occasional Italian words
f. 6r, the first cipher page. The figures run together between words left in clear. Image: Archivio Apostolico Vaticano, Segreteria di Stato, Francia 104 f. 6r, via DECODE R5622.

02 Why the Francia 346 key fails

The reconstructed key used for the 1632 Barberini–Ceva letters in Francia 346 is a mixed-width homophonic and syllabic nomenclator. In it the one-digit figure 6 separates groups and does not occur inside any code. Here, pairs and triples of sixes occur throughout the manuscript. Splitting at every six creates empty separators, orphan digits and groups absent from the table. A checked line passed through the Francia 346 decoder gives malformed groups and no Italian.

This excludes that table whatever the quality of the OCR or the language-model scores. It does not identify the 1652 system.

04 Why there is no transcription

Whole-line OCR, character segmentation and glyph clustering were tried on all four cipher pages. Touching figures, variable spacing, bleed-through and changes in the hand generated too many substitutions and omissions. In a mixed-width nomenclator a dropped or added digit shifts every later group boundary, so a noisy digit stream cannot be used. The OCR output was discarded.

05 What is needed

  1. A line-by-line manual transcription of ff. 6r–7v, checked independently against the scans.
  2. The Secretariat’s register decipherment or the Paris nunciature key for 1652, probably requiring work in the AAV.
  3. Alternatively, more letters from Francia 104 shown to use the same key, giving enough clean material to infer group boundaries and rebuild the nomenclator.

06 Sources

Research notes and machine-readable profile: bagno1652/.