of by 102:43:97:133:52:180: and concerning 57:102:58:20:30: dispatch back…
23 numbers in five runs: a few names and a place, not decoded

Paris → a royalist in Holland · numbers in clear English · 28 December 1652 and 3 May 1653

“Mr. Conleys Hand”: two letters in Abraham Cowley’s hand, Paris 1652–53

Abraham Cowley
fromAbraham Cowley

British Library, Harley MS 7003 ff. 314r–315r, DECODE R7768 and R7769: a fair copy of two letters from the exiled Queen’s court at Paris, in clear English with a few code numbers.

Both letters were transcribed from the DECODE images. The author name on DECODE is a misreading of the docket. The numbers were tested against the one related key in the repository and were not decoded; the letters were not found in the printed Cowley correspondence.

Daniel Bourdeau · posted · updated

Method: not solved · Extent: text not obtained

Summary. DECODE lists these two records under an author called “Mr. Conleys Hand”, sending from Paris to an unknown recipient, and lists them as a nomenclator with no decipherment. The images show a clean copy of two letters, dated Paris, 28 December 1652 and 3 May 1653. A docket in another hand reads “mr Cowleys Hand”: the original was written by Abraham Cowley. The poet was secretary to Lord Jermyn and, by his biographer’s account, ciphered and deciphered most of the letters between the King and Queen. The letters are almost wholly in clear English. They cover Bordeaux’s mission to England, the Dutch war, the Fronde, the King’s journey into Holland and a rumour that the Bordelais would declare a republic. The cipher is 23 numbers in five runs standing for a place and a few persons. These were not decoded. The numbers are too few to rebuild a key. The Hyde–Barwick key of 1659 gives nonsense, and the letters are not among Cowley’s printed letters to Henry Bennet. One reading is offered as a hypothesis only: the place is “Scotland”. Status: clear text transcribed; code numbers not decoded. A Jermyn or Queen’s cipher of 1652–53 would open them.

01 The documents

Handwritten lines ending 'of by 102:43:97:133:52:180: and concerning 57:102:58:20:30: dispatch'
Harley MS 7003 f. 314r, letter of 28 December 1652: two of the five code runs inside the clear text. Image: British Library, Harley MS 7003 f. 314r, via DECODE R7768.

R7768 images f. 314r and f. 314v. R7769 images f. 314v and f. 315r, so the middle leaf appears on both records (the two files are byte-identical). The first letter runs from f. 314r to the top of f. 314v, and under it another hand has written “mr Cowleys Hand”. DECODE read that note as “Conleys” and made it the author. The second letter starts lower on f. 314v and ends on f. 315r with a postscript. Below that, f. 315r starts an unrelated letter (“My Lo:”) from a royalist waiting at the Hague. It has no numbers on the imaged part.

The writer is at the Queen’s court. “She intends to write to you”, and he has promised the recipient money. That fits Jermyn’s household, where Cowley wrote. The recipient is in Holland and short of money, and has a son for whom he has asked a favour of the King and Queen. He is neither Secretary Nicholas nor the Chancellor, since both are named in the third person. He is not identified.

02 The letters

The full text is in conley1652/transcription.txt. Their content:

03 The cipher

runcontext
228:196:188a country or region: “the present estate of ___ … assistance to be sent thither against next spring”
102:43:97:133:52:180a person: “informed of by ___”
57:102:58:20:30a person: “concerning ___ dispatch back”
248:88:46:47:96:52:7:57a place: “the person that came lately from ___”
203a person: “write a word to Mr ___”

There are 23 numbers, 20 of them distinct, running from 7 to 248. The runs of five, six and eight look like names spelled out letter by letter, and the three-number run and the single 203 look like code words. Three values repeat: 102, 52 and 57.

Hypothesis (grade M). The eight-number place is “Scotland” (s c o t l a n d). In the winter of 1652–53 the Glencairn rising was being raised in the Highlands, and the court at Paris was looking for help for it by the spring. That would make 52 = a and 57 = d, and the run 57:102:58:20:30 would begin with d. The other runs share too few letters to test it, so it stays a guess from context.

04 What was tried

  1. Print. Cowley’s fifteen known letters to Henry Bennet, 30 April 1650 to 13 September 1653, are printed in Miscellanea Aulica (1702). A search of the archive.org full text found neither of these letters. Web searches for their distinctive clear phrases also found nothing. The Clarendon State Papers calendar and Nethercot’s list of Cowley’s letters (1928) were not checked.
  2. A related key. The royalist Hyde–Barwick cipher of 1659, which the repository already holds, gives meaningless syllables (“much at vi”, “ma p ka ar s ru”). Ruled out.
  3. Ciphertext only. Not attempted: 23 numbers cannot fix a key.

05 What is needed

A Jermyn or Queen’s cipher of 1652–53, such as the royalist keys in the Clarendon and Nicholas papers, or the original letters, if they carry a decipherment. Identifying the recipient, a royalist in Holland with a son, would show where to look.

06 Sources

Transcription, the code runs, notes and profile: conley1652/.