λ χ Ⱡ o 1 9 : 4 1 C π o ∂ m 1 3 T 2 1 2 0 2 2 1 2 0 ħ
“pour le regard du […] affin que 72 ne puissent prendre cognoissance de noz affaires”

Saint-Quentin → Villeroy · figures and signs, nomenclator · 16 August 1595

The duc de Nevers to Villeroy, 16 August 1595

Duke of Nevers
fromDuke of Nevers
Nicolas de Neufville, seigneur de Villeroy
toNicolas de Neufville, seigneur de Villeroy

BnF, français 3993, no. 102, ff. 148r–149r: Nevers’s file copy of a letter written from Saint-Quentin while Fuentes besieged Cambrai. Seventeen passages, 753 symbols, are in a cipher of figures and graphic signs. No contemporary decipherment is known.

The passages were transcribed from the Gallica scans and tested against every surviving Nevers key of 1594–95; none fits. A ciphertext-only solver recovers the key of a matched control of the same size but finds no French in the letter. The key was not recovered.

Daniel Bourdeau · posted · updated

Method: not solved · Extent: text not obtained

Summary. The catalogue listed this letter with no known key. Tomokiyo’s League page gives no decipherment for it (his “undeciphered” means that no contemporary decipherment is known) and notes that none of the ciphers in the Nevers collection (BnF fr. 3995) decrypts it. The copy is in clear French with seventeen enciphered runs: 753 symbols, dominated by the figures 1 and 2, with about forty-five graphic signs (λ, π, θ, Δ, ∞, ‡, ϖ, a reversed c, a tau…). Nevers explains at the outset why he enciphers: what is most pressing should go in cipher “affin que 72 ne puissent prendre cognoissance de noz affaires”, with the enemy written as the code number 72. The closest key in the collection, no. 76 (fr. 3995 ff. 142v–143r), was transcribed in full: same family of signs, same design of figures, letters, Greek capitals and a numbered word list, but different values, and it gives no French. Nos. 65, 66 and 68–75 do not fit either. A homophonic solver (simulated annealing) recovers the key of a control of the same length and shape letter for letter, and finds nothing on the letter under six ways of dividing the figures into units. The cipher is therefore not a plain homophonic substitution. It is most likely a nomenclator with syllables and code words whose distinguishing marks the copyist dropped, and 753 symbols are too few to recover such a key without plaintext. The next letter in the series, of 18 August, is all in clear. Status: not solved. It needs the key (not in fr. 3995) or the letter as Villeroy received it, which may carry his secretary’s decipherment.

01 The letter

The foot of f. 148r: two lines of clear text, then six lines of figures and signs with 'par ce qu'il faut necessairement que nous' in the middle
f. 148r, the long run: “Or j’ay bien ce mauvais augure…”, three lines of cipher, “par ce qu’il faut necessairement que nous”, three more. Image: Bibliothèque nationale de France, français 3993 f. 148r, via Gallica (btv1b9059229n, view 161).

The copy (BnF notice: “Lettre, avec chiffre, de Louis de Gonzague, duc de Nevers, à monseigneur de Villeroy… De St Quentin, ce 16 aoust 1595. Copie”) runs over three pages in a secretary’s hand. Nevers was commanding in Picardy after the fall of Doullens (31 July); Fuentes had opened the siege of Cambrai, held by Balagny, a few days before. The letter is about the relief of Cambrai: a convoy that must risk “ung grand combat”, the people of the town who will not hold, the need to assemble the council. Nevers opens with a reproach that explains the cipher:

Vous faictes beaucoup pour le service du Roy a escrire assez intelligiblement … mais il me semble que ce qui est de plus pregnant seroit bon d’estre en chiffre, par ce que s’il se perdoit des lettres … pour le regard du [cipher] affin que 72 ne puissent prendre cognoissance de noz affaires.
One line: 'parle pour le regard du' followed by a run of signs and figures, then 'affin que 72 ne'
f. 148r l. 7, the first run, between “pour le regard du” and “affin que 72 ne”. Image: Bibliothèque nationale de France, français 3993 f. 148r, via Gallica (btv1b9059229n, view 161).

The other runs sit in the same way inside clear sentences: “dans lequel temps il faut se resoudre de […] contre […]” (f. 148v), “et croy que […], pour faire donc telle chose il faut assembler le conseil” (f. 148v), “aussy tost que […]. Et a moy advis” and “et si luy ne parle […], je le doibs declarer” (f. 149r). The copy ends “De St Quentin ce 16. Aoust 1595”.

02 The cipher

The 753 symbols (measured on the transcription, ct_f148r.txt and ct_f148v_149r.txt) are of 54 kinds. Figures make up more than half: 1 occurs 112 times, 2 92 times, a small circle (letter o or figure 0; the copy does not distinguish them) 74 times. The figure 1 is followed by another figure 87% of the time and “20” occurs 33 times, so the figures are mostly written in pairs. Cut into pairs wherever a figure is followed by another, only about 45 figures are left over. The other signs are Greek letters (λ, π, θ, Δ, χ, ϖ), ∞, a crossed dagger, a reversed c, a tau, an arch, a u with two bars, and italic letters. There are few repeats longer than four symbols; the longest, “41 0 3 1 2”, occurs twice.

03 The keys of the Nevers collection

The alphabet rows of a key sheet: letters a to z, each with a figure, a letter and sometimes a Greek sign beneath, and a list of nulls
The alphabet of fr. 3995 no. 76 (rotated): a = 8, y, +; b = 7, x; c = 9, z; d = 5, K; e = 3, t, ϖ; … p = λ, h; r = ∂, ƒ, θ; s = □, e, π; nulls at the right. The same family of signs as the letter, with other values. Image: Bibliothèque nationale de France, français 3995 ff. 142v–143r, via Gallica (btv1b525085665, view 274).

BnF fr. 3995 is Nevers’s own collection of keys, catalogued by Tomokiyo as nos. 1–76. Those of 1594–95 were opened on the Gallica images:

The key the letter used belonged to the Nevers–Villeroy correspondence and is not among the keys Nevers kept. A “clef d’un chiffre employé par le duc de Nevers” in BnF fr. 3618 ff. 3–4 dates from 1591 and is not digitised.

04 The ciphertext-only attack

A homophonic solver (simulated annealing; one plaintext letter per unit, a five-gram language model of Henri IV’s letters, 600 000 moves, four restarts) was first checked on a control: 753 letters of French in the letter’s seventeen run lengths, enciphered with a random key of 49 homophones and three nulls. It recovers the control’s plaintext letter for letter, and all restarts agree. On the letter it was run under six ways of dividing the figures into units: every sign alone; pairs of figures after 1 or 2; every pair of figures; 1 joined to the following sign (the unit of the 1588 informant’s cipher in the same archive); pairs collapsed to their decade; and no. 65’s design, with 10, 20… as nulls and numbers above 64 as codes. None gives French, and the restarts do not agree with one another. A second solver that lets a unit stand for a consonant-and-vowel syllable, as the figures do in the Court key no. 57, fails on its own control of that design, so that hypothesis cannot be tested at this length.

05 What stays open

06 Sources

Transcription, key notes, solvers and controls: nevers1595/.