1320. 365. 1700. 1041. 532. 1240. 680. 941. 1512. 624. 636. 913 …
key not found: a code of about 2,000 values, 7–1737 and 3018–3297

Moscow → “Votre Majesté” · numerical code · 1744

Esterházy papers, box 636: the cipher letters of 1744

Six cipher documents of 1744 in the Esterházy archive have no decipherment; the one page online was transcribed and tested against every Vienna key of those years on DECODE, and none fits.

Daniel Bourdeau · posted

Method: not solved · Extent: text not obtained

At a glanceNot solved · 0 of 176 cipher numbers

The documents
Six documents of 1744, five in French and one in German, one of them from Maria Theresa to Count Nicolaus Esterházy. The only one visible online is a despatch headed “Moscau ce 5e d’octobre 1744” and addressed to a sovereign (“Votre Majesté”).
Where
Slovenský národný archív, Bratislava, fond Esterházi – čeklíska vetva, box 636. Not on DECODE or HCPortal. One partial page is printed as Figure 6 of Antal et al., HistoCrypt 2023.
The cipher
Numbers separated by dots, from 7 to 1737 plus a block from 3018 to 3297: a code or large nomenclator of about 2,000 values. 157 of the 176 numbers occur only once.
How it was tried
The Vienna chancery keys of 1740–1746 on DECODE were opened, including the 1745 French and German circular ciphers sent to Rosenberg and Esterházy. None reaches the values 1500–1737 or 3000–3297.
Why it resists
176 numbers of a 2,000-value code are too few to attack without the key, and the other five documents are not online.
Still open
Everything. The next steps are scans of box 636 from the Slovak National Archives and the 1744 keys for Russia and Saxony in the Vienna archives.

01 The documents

The Esterházy family archive at the Slovak National Archives (fond Esterházi, čeklíska vetva) was surveyed for ciphers by Eugen Antal, Pavol Marák, Pavol Zajac, Tünde Lengyelová and Diana Duchoňová. Their paper at HistoCrypt 2023 describes box 636 in a paragraph. It holds six encrypted documents, one fully enciphered draft and five letters, five in French and one in German, all of 1744. One letter is from Maria Theresa to Count Nicolaus Esterházy (1711–1764); the other correspondents were not identified. No plain text exists for any of them. The keys kept in the same fonds do not fit, and neither do the Vienna and Hungarian keys the authors tried.

The archive has scanned the box at 4160 × 6240 pixels. The scans were meant to go onto HCPortal but are not there yet: up to record 1881, checked on 9 October 2026, HCPortal holds nothing from this fonds. DECODE has no records from the Slovak National Archives. The only image anyone can see is the paper’s Figure 6.

Upper part of a letter headed 'Moscau ce 5e d'octobre 1744', a clear opening sentence, eleven lines of numbers separated by dots, and a clear sentence beginning 'La refutation de l'Imprimé de la Cour de Vienne'
The Moscow despatch of 5 October 1744: clear heading and opening, eleven lines of figures, then clear text again. Image: Slovenský národný archív, fond Esterházi – čeklíska vetva, box 636, as reproduced in Antal et al., HistoCrypt 2023, Figure 6 (CC BY 4.0).

The page opens in clear: “Moscau ce 5e d’octobre 1744. J’ai reçu avec un tres profond respect les Re- & Postscripts de Votre Majesté en date du 15e Septembre.” Eleven lines of figures follow. The clear text then resumes: “La refutation de l’Imprimé de la Cour de Vienne est trop solide, pour ne pas …”. The Russian court spent 1744 in Moscow, so this is an envoy’s despatch from that court to his sovereign. The Viennese “Imprimé” is presumably the court’s printed answer in the Botta affair of 1743. The writer is not named on the visible part. Count Philipp Joseph Orsini-Rosenberg, Austrian ambassador to Russia from mid-1744, writing to Maria Theresa, would fit, but another envoy writing to his king is not ruled out. It is also unexplained why the letter is among Esterházy’s papers: he was then Maria Theresa’s envoy in Dresden.

02 The cipher

The transcription has 176 groups in eleven lines, 157 of them distinct. Four groups are uncertain in the figure: 1056, 1603, 193 and 806. The values run from 7 to 1737, spread evenly across every hundred, with a separate block of twelve groups from 3018 to 3297. Six groups are below 100 (7, 19, 24, 54, 77, 83). The Vienna chancery’s 1745 instruction for its circular cipher (DECODE R1598) tells clerks to scatter two-digit nulls through the text, so these may be nulls. Only 1337 and 536 occur three times, fifteen others twice, and no pair of groups repeats. A few groups are underlined in the manuscript (438, 1000, 1059; 1737 twice). These marks are recorded in the transcription file.

This is a code or large syllabic nomenclator of about 2,000 values, of the kind the Vienna chancery issued to its envoys. It is not a small homophonic alphabet.

03 What was tried

Every dated key record of 1735–1750 from the Haus-, Hof- und Staatsarchiv on DECODE was listed, and those of 1740–1746 were opened:

None covers both 1500–1737 and 3000–3297. The 1745 circulars are closest in style, and both Rosenberg and Esterházy received them, but the Moscow letter is from 1744 and its numbers run beyond theirs. They were ruled out on value range; no key was applied group by group.

No reading of box 636 was found in print or online. The search turned up a sibling: a letter in cipher from Maria Theresa to Esterházy, Vienna, 31 July 1744, sold by the Dorotheum on 17 December 2024. The auction house describes a three-digit word code and says a copy of its key survives in the Austrian State Archives. That letter is not in box 636. A three-digit code, as described, would not produce the four-digit groups of the Moscow page.

No ciphertext-only attack was run. 176 groups of a 2,000-value code, almost all seen once, give a solver nothing to fit.

04 What would finish it

05 Sources

Transcription, notes and profile: targets/esterhazy1744/.